DailyVista is going beyond the headlines to provide news and insight from a marketing and advertising standpoint.


What Readers Say...

read more »

Partners

Kantar Media

DV Blog

Taco Bell Stays on the Offensive

Using lawsuit to its advantage
by Josh Stone | published on Apr 21, 2011

In the wake of blunders like Chrysler’s errant tweet in March, I’ve written how instead of taking typical corporate approaches – public firings, finger pointing, contrived PR – companies should spin this mass negative attention and use it to their advantage.

Case in point – Taco Bell, who continues to go on the offensive with a new ad campaign attacking Beasley Allen, the law firm  responsible for filing, and then withdrawing this week, a false advertising lawsuit against the chain for claiming to use "seasoned beef" or "seasoned ground beef" in its offerings.

The January lawsuit stated that Taco Bell misleads consumers, and that it actually serves “taco meat filling,” using “extenders” and other non-meat substances.

When this lawsuit initially broke, I figured Taco Bell would take the typical corporate approach and settle, counting a few million lost as better than the negative attention that months of litigation would cause.

Of course, the ambulance chasers thrive on this, but my favorite fast feeder took the high road by defending its product and scoring lasting branding points in the process.

Taco Bell reacted quickly to the lawsuit, launching an aggressive national campaign within days that included full page ads in national and local publications and YouTube videos telling consumers what ingredients are actually in its beef.

The latest victory campaign uses the same mix, including print ads developed by AOR DraftFCB that read "Would it kill you to say you're sorry? in large, bold type followed by:Taco Bell

“The law firm that brought false claims about our product quality and advertising integrity has voluntarily withdrawn their class action suit against Taco Bell. No changes to our products or ingredients. No changes to our advertising. No money exchanged. No settlement agreement. Because we've ALWAYS used 100% USDA-inspected premium beef.”

Like the previous campaign, CEO Greg Creed has also posted a video on YouTube speaking about the lawsuit’s withdrawal.

Way to go Taco Bell! Brilliant messaging and great campaigns. The Crunchwrap Supreme lives!
 
What could have been a nightmare has turned into a brilliant PR move. It’s great to see a company of Taco Bell's size go against the playbook and take the offensive like this. If more companies followed this example maybe our country’s affinity for frivolous lawsuits would go down, but that’s a post for another time.
 
However, while it looks like our heroes are set to ride off into the sunset, the truth is that no matter how great Taco Bell’s counterattack has been, the lingering slime of false lawsuits remains in consumers’ minds for some time.
 
Even amidst the fanfare Thursday and “No money exchanged” messaging, Facebook fans are still sarcastically questioning why the lawsuit went away, while offering congratulations.
 
“Yay your liars, i mean lawyers, got you out of reviling what is in your beef,” one user wrote.
 
Another – “You mean you guys gave undisclosed amount of money to the plaintiff to drop the suit.”
 
It just goes to show that no matter how brilliant the PR and media campaign, Taco Bell can never sidestep one fact – it’s a corporation after all. Who isn't skeptical of big business, especially nowadays?

{lg_social_bookmarks title="Taco Bell Stays on the Offensive" permalink="http://www.dailyvista.com/blog/comments"}

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

    {social_sites}
  • {social_site_name} Favicon
  • {/social_sites}
{/lg_social_bookmarks}